Chairperson: Dr. Janan T. Eppig
Chairperson: Dr. Goran Levan
Rules for mouse genetic nomenclature were first published by Dunn, Gruneberg, and Snell (1940) and subsequently revised by the International Committee for Standardized Genetic Nomenclature in Mice (1963, 1973, 1981, 1989, 1993). In 2000 these Guidelines were completely rewritten in order to explain more clearly the rules. Some existing gene names and symbols may retain names derived from earlier conventions that no longer apply. Archived Guidelines (since 2000) are available online.
Rules for rat genetic nomenclature were first published by the Committee on Rat Nomenclature in 1992 and then by Levan et al. in 1995.
In 2003, the International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice and the Rat Genome and Nomenclature Committee agreed to unify the rules and guidelines for gene, allele, and mutation nomenclature in mouse and rats. This document reflects that unification. Nomenclature guidelines are now reviewed and updated annually by the two International Committees and current guidelines can be found on the MGD and RGD or RatMap web sites. The Guidelines found here include all revisions approved at the October 19, 2004 meeting of the International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice and the September 11, 2004 meeting of the Rat Genome and Nomenclature Committee.
The key component of nomenclature is the gene or locus name and symbol, which identifies a unit of inheritance. Other features, such as alleles, variants and mutations, are secondary to the gene name and become associated with it. Similarly, probes or assays used to detect a gene are not primary features and should not normally be used as names.
The primary purpose of a gene or locus name and symbol is to be a unique identifier so that information about the gene in publications, databases and other forms of communication can be unambiguously associated with the correct gene. These guidelines, therefore, are intended to aid the scientific community as a whole to use genetic information.
Other, secondary, functions of nomenclature for genes are to:
It is important that the user understands what is being named and the principles underlying these guidelines. Section 5 presents definitions that will aid the user in distinguishing, for example, genes, loci, markers, and alleles.
On the whole gene names should be stable; that is, they should not be changed over time. However there are certain circumstances where a change is desirable:
A gene can have several synonyms, which are names or symbols that have been applied to the gene at various times. These synonyms may be associated with the gene in databases and publications, but the established gene name and symbol should always be used as the primary identifier.
The prime function of a gene name is to provide a unique identifier.
The Mouse Genome Database (MGD) serves as a central repository of gene names and symbols to avoid use of the same name for different genes or use of multiple names for the same gene (http://www.informatics.jax.org). The MGD Nomenclature Committee (firstname.lastname@example.org)provides advice and assistance in assigning new names and symbols. A web tool for proposing a new locus symbol is located at the MGD site.
For the rat, these functions are carried out by RatMap (http://ratmap.gen.gu.se) and RGD (http://rgd.mcw.edu) assisted by the International Rat Genome and Nomenclature Committee (RGNC). A web tool for proposing a new locus symbol is located at the RatMap and RGD sites.
A key feature of mouse and rat nomenclature is the Laboratory Registration Code or Laboratory code, which is a code of usually three to four letters (first letter uppercase, followed by all lowercase), that identifies a particular institute, laboratory, or investigator that produced, and may hold stocks of, for example, a DNA marker, a mouse or rat strain,or a mutation. Laboratory codes are also used in naming chromosomal aberrations and transgenes. Laboratory codes can be assigned by MGD or by the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) at http://dels.nas.edu/ilar_n/ilarhome/register_lc.shtml.
J The Jackson Laboratory Mit Massachusetts Institute of Technology Leh Hans Lehrach Kyo Kyoto University Ztm Central Animal Laboratory Medical School Hannover
Identification of new genes in general comes in two ways; identification of a novel protein or DNA sequence or identification of a novel phenotype or trait. In the case of sequences, care should be taken in interpretation of database searches to establish novelty (for example, to distinguish between a new member of a gene family and an allele or alternative transcript of an existing family member). Novel mutant phenotypes or traits should be named according to their primary characteristic, but once the gene responsible for the phenotypic variation is identified, this gives the primary name of the gene and the mutant name becomes the name of the allele (see Section 2.3).
Names of genes should be brief, and convey accurate information about the gene. The name should not convey detailed information about the gene or assay used; this can be associated with the gene in publications or databases. While the gene name should ideally be informative as to the function or nature of the gene, care should be taken to avoid putting inaccurate information in the name. For example, a "liver-specific protein" may be shown by subsequent studies to be expressed elsewhere.
A gene name should:
Blr1 Burkitt lymphoma receptor 1 Acly ATP citrate lyase
Acp1 acid phosphatase 1, soluble Pigq phosphatidylinositol glycan, class Q
Shh sonic hedgehog
[commonly used, does not include species name]
Fjx1 four jointed box 1 (Drosophila)
[name includes species derivative]
Genes are given short symbols as convenient abbreviations for speaking and writing about the genes.
A gene symbol should:
Plaur urokinase plasminogen activator receptor Sta autosomal striping
Glra1 glycine receptor, alpha 1 subunit Glra2 glycine receptor, alpha 2 subunit Glra3 glycine receptor, alpha 3 subunit
Exceptions to the rule of uppercase first letter and lowercase remaining letters in a gene or locus symbol:
Use of hyphens within the symbol should be kept to a minimum. Situations where hyphens may be used include:
Hk1-rs1 hexose kinase-related sequence 1 Hba-ps3 hemoglobin alpha pseudogene 3
Kit W-v Kit oncogene
allele name: viable dominant spotting
Ultimately, the majority of gene names will be for structural genes that encode protein. The gene should as far as possible be given the same name as the protein, whenever the protein is identified. If the gene is recognizable by sequence comparison as a member of an established gene family, it should be named accordingly (see Section 2.6).
Alternative transcripts that originate from the same gene are not normally given different gene symbols and names. However, alternative transcripts (splice variants) from a single locus can be differentiated by the addition of an underscore v and a serial number (_v#) to the symbol and the addition of a comma “variant” and serial number to the name.
Slc14a2 solute carrier family 14, member 2 Slc14a2_v1 solute carrier family 14, member 2, variant 1 Slc14a2_v2 solute carrier family 14, member 2, variant 2 Slc14a2_v3 solute carrier family 14, member 2, variant 3 Slc14a2_v4 solute carrier family 14, member 2, variant 4
Transcripts from the opposite strand that overlap another gene, or a transcript that is derived principally from the introns of another gene, or one that uses an alternative reading frame to another gene (and does not use the existing frame to a significant extent) should be given a different name.
In addition to alternative transcripts based on splice variants, genes may use multiple promoters. The variant promoters can be designated in a similar way to splice variants, adding an underscore pr and a serial number (_pr#) to the symbol and the addition of a comma “promoter” and serial number to the name.
Slc14a2 solute carrier family 14, member 2 Slc14a2_pr1 solute carrier family 14, member 2, promoter 1 Slc14a2_pr2 solute carrier family 14, member 2, promoter 2
It should be noted that for both splice variants and promoters, that serial numbers are assigned as these elements are discovered. The numbering sequence does not correspond to relative location in the genome and the numbering series are independent among species. For these elements, no attempt is made to develop cross-species equivalency.
To aid interspecific comparison of genetic and other information, genes that is identifiable as a homolog of an already named gene in another species can be named as "-like" "- homolog" or "-related ". (Note: this is not the same as "related sequence" which applies to related sequences within mouse or within rat.) The gene name or symbol should not include the name mouse or the abbreviation "M" for mouse or the name rat or the abbreviation “R” for rat. Where possible, genes that are recognizable orthologs of already-named human genes should be given the same name and symbol as the human gene.
Genes named for phenotypes should aim to convey the phenotype briefly and accurately in a few words. It is accepted that the name may not cover all aspects of the phenotype; what is needed is a succinct, memorable and, most importantly, unique, name. Bear in mind that identification of a variant or mutant phenotype is recognition of an allelic form of an as-yet unidentified gene that may already have or will be given a name.
Genes identified solely by a recessive lethal phenotype with no heterozygous effect are named for the chromosomal assignment, a serial number and the name of the laboratory of origin (from the Laboratory code).
l5H1 First lethal on Chromosome 5 at Harwell l4Rn2 Second lethal on Chromosome 4 from laboratory of Gene Rinchik
Genes that appear to be members of a family should be named as family members. Evidence of gene families comes in a variety of forms, e.g., from a probe detecting multiple bands on a Southern blot, but is principally based on sequence comparisons.
Historically, many gene families have been identified as fragments detected by hybridization to the same probe but which map to different loci. These family members may be functional genes or pseudogenes. The loci can be named "related sequence" of the founder gene with a serial number (symbol -rs1, -rs2, and so on).
mouse ornithine decarboxylase-related sequences 1 to 21. Odc-rs1 to Odc-rs21
If the founder or functional gene can not be identified, initially all the fragments are named "related sequence" until it is identified; then that particular "-rs" is dropped, without renumbering. If there is evidence that any loci are pseudogenes, they should be named as such and given serial numbers as in Section 2.6.2.
Once sequence evidence is accumulated on functional family members (which may or may not have been previously identified as members) a systematic naming scheme should be applied to the family as in Section 2.6.2.
Sequencing can identify genes that are clearly members of a family (paralogs). Where possible, members of the family should be named and symbolized using the same stem followed by a serial number. The same family members in different mammalian species (orthologs) should, wherever possible, be given the same name and symbol. Pseudogenes should be suffixed by -ps and a serial number if there are multiple pseudogenes. Note that the numbering of pseudogenes among species is independent and no relationship should be implied among mouse, rat, or human pseudogenes based on their serial numbering.
In mouse, phosphoglycerate kinase 1, pseudogenes 1 to 7, Pgk1-ps1 to Pgk1-ps7 In rat, calmodulin pseudogene 1, Calm-ps1
Numerous gene families have been recognized and given systematic nomenclature. Information on these families can be found at family-specific web sites, some of which are linked from MGD and RGD or RatMap. Names and symbols of new members of these families should follow the rules of the particular family and ideally be assigned in consultation with the curator of that family. Nomenclature schemes and curation of new families benefit from examination of existing models.
Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) differ from other expressed sequences in that they are short, single pass sequences that are often convenient for PCR amplification from genomic DNA. ESTs that clearly derive from a known gene should be considered simply as an assay (marker) for that known gene. When anonymous ESTs are mapped onto genetic or physical maps, their designations should be symbolized using their sequence database accession number.
Only anonymous DNA segments that are mapped should be given systematic names and symbols.
Anonymous DNA segments are named and symbolized according to the laboratory identifying or mapping the segment as "DNA segment, chromosome N, Lab Name" and a serial number, where N is the chromosomal assignment (1-19, X, Y in the mouse and 1-20, X, Y in the rat) and is symbolized as DNLabcode#.
D8Mit17 the 17th locus mapped to mouse Chromosome 8 by M.I.T. D1Arb27 the 27th locus mapped to rat Chromosome 1 at the Arthritis and Rheumatism Branch, NIAMS.
The same convention is applied to DNA segments that are variant loci within known genes.
D4Mit17 an SSLP within the mouse Orm1 gene D20Wox37 an SSLP within the rat Tnfgene
Mouse or rat DNA segments that are detected by cross-hybridization to human segments are given the human name with "chromosome N, cross-hybridizing to human DNA segment" inserted between DNA segment and the human segment code (see symbols). The same applies for rat DNA segments detected by cross-hybridization to mouse segments (or vice versa).
D16H21S56 Mouse DNA segment on Chr 16 that cross-hybridizes with a DNA segment D21S56 from human Chr 21. D1M7Mit236 Rat DNA segment on Chr 1 that cross-hybridizes with a DNA segment D7Mit236 from mouse Chr 7
When physical maps are assembled (YAC or BAC contigs, for example) many markers may be placed on the map in the form of Sequence Tagged Sites (STSs). These might be clone end-fragments, inter-repeat sequence PCR products, or random sequences from within clones. These markers serve to validate the contigs and appear on the maps, but their further utility may be limited. It is not necessary to give them names or symbols other than those assigned by the laboratory that produced and used them. If the STSs are used more widely, they should be assigned anonymous DNA segment names ("D-numbers").
Gene trap experiments in embryonic stem (ES) cells produce cell lines in which integration into a putative gene is selected by virtue of its expression in ES cells. The trapped gene is usually (though not necessarily) mutated by the integration. The site of integration can be characterized by a number of means, including cloning or extension of cDNA products. The loci of integration of a series of gene trap lines, once characterized as potentially unique, can be named and symbolized as members of a series, using the prefix Gt (for gene trap), followed by a vector designation in parentheses, a serial number assigned by the laboratory characterizing the locus, and the laboratory ILAR code. For example, the 26th gene "trapped" by the ROSA vector in the laboratory of Phillip Soriano (Sor) is symbolized as:
A gene trap designation becomes an allele of the gene into which it was inserted, once that gene is identified. For example, Gt(pGT1.8TM)629Ska is now known to disrupt the netrin 1 (Ntn1) gene; thus the full allele designation for this gene trap mutation is NtnGt(pGT1.8TM)629Ska and its abbreviated form is NtnGt629Ska. (Note: Abbreviate gene trap alleles by dropping the vector designation in parentheses, if the resulting abbreviation is unique).
Differences between inbred strains and the phenotype of offspring of crosses between strains provide evidence for the existence of genes affecting disease resistance, immune response, and many other quantitative traits (quantitative trait loci, QTL). Evidence for QTL is generally obtained through extensive genetic crossing and analysis that may uncover many genetic elements contributing to a phenotypic trait. Generally, the number and effects of QTL can only be deduced following experiments to map them. QTL should not be named until such mapping experiments have been performed.
Names and symbols for QTL should be brief and descriptive and reflect the trait or phenotype measured. Those QTL affecting the same trait should be given the same stem and serially numbered. The series is separate for mouse and rat and no homology should be implied by the serial numbers.
Some historically named QTL carry the name of the disease with which they are associated; these names are maintained; but newly identified QTL should be named for the measured trait and not a disease. The suffix "q" may be used optionally as the final letter preceding the serial number in QTL symbols.
Naming and symbolizing QTL follow the same conventions as for naming and symbolizing genes (Section 2.3). Specifically for a QTL, its name should include:
in mouse Cafq1 caffeine metabolism QTL 1 Cafq2 caffeine metabolism QTL 2 Cafq3 caffeine metabolism QTL 3 in rat Kw1 kidney weight QTL 1 Kw2 kidney weight QTL 2 Kw3 kidney weight QTL 3
To obtain the next available serial number for a new QTL with an already established root name, e.g., the next in the series of “liver weight QTL” in mouse (Lwq#) or the next in series of “blood pressure QTL” for rat (Bp#), users should submit their QTL on the “proposing a new locus symbol” form at MGD (for mouse) or RGD or RatMap (for rat). Note that examining the database content for a QTL is not sufficient, as a laboratory may have a QTL designation reserved and private, pending publication.
Specific circumstances for naming independent QTL include:
Because QTL are detected in the context of specific strain combinations in specific crosses and generally in different laboratories using different assays, each experimentally detecting QTL will be given a unique symbol/name even when the trait measured and region defined is superficially the same as that of an existing QTL.
Example: In mouse, Obq1 (obesity QTL 1) was identified and mapped to Chromosome 7 in a cross between strains 129/Sv and EL/Suz. Another obesity QTL was also mapped to Chromosome 7, but because it involved distinct strains (NZO and SM), it was given a different QTL designation, Obq15.
If multiple traits are measured in a single experiment and mapped to a single chromosomal region, there may or may not be evidence that different QTL are involved. If the traits are physiologically related, the QTL name should be broad enough to represent all the measured traits or the name should reflect the trait showing the highest LOD score/p-value. Conversely, if there is clear evidence that the traits are independent, each trait will constitute a unique QTL.
Examples: In mouse, Nidd1 (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus 1) was associated with related measurements of plasma insulin, non-fasted blood glucose, and body weight and given a single QTL designation.
In rats, Uae5 (urinary albumin excretion QTL 5) and Hw1 (heart weight QTL 1) are QTLs derived from the same experiment that map to overlapping regions of Chromosome 1. Because the measured traits are independent, different QTL designations are assigned.
Separate documents detail guidelines for nomenclature of chromosomes (for mouse, Rules for Nomenclature of Chromosome Aberrations are online; for rat, see Levan, et al., 1995). However, certain cytological features of normal chromosomes (such as telomeres, centromeres, and nucleolar organizers) and abnormal chromosomes (such as homogeneously-staining regions and end-points of deletions, inversions, and translocations) are genetic loci that are given names and ymbols.
The functional telomere should be denoted by the symbol Tel. A DNA segment that includes the telomere repeat sequence (TTAGGG)n and which maps to a telomeric location is symbolized in four parts:
For example, Tel14q1
The functional centromere should be denoted by the symbol Cen. Until the molecular nature of a functional mammalian centromere is defined, DNA segments that map to the centromere should be given anonymous DNA segment symbols as in Section 2.8.1.
Pericentric heterochromatin, that is cytologically visible, is given the symbol Hc#, in which # is the chromosome on which it is located.
Variation in heterochromatin band size can be denoted by superscripts to the symbol.
The nucleolus organizer is a cytological structure that contains the ribosomal RNA genes. These genes are given the symbols Rnr and the number of the chromosome on which they are located.
If different Rnr loci can be genetically identified on the same chromosome, they are given serial numbers in order of identification.
Homogeneously staining regions (HSRs) are amplified internal subchromosomal bands that are identified cytologically by their Giemsa staining. A DNA segment that maps within an HSR is given a conventional DNA segment symbol, when its locus is on a normal (unamplified) chromosome. When expanded into an HSR its symbol follows the guidelines for insertions, thus becoming Is(HSR;1)1Lub.
Symbols for chromosomal deletions, inversions, and translocations are given in the chromosomal nomenclature section. The end points of each of these rearrangements, however, define a locus. Where there is only a single locus on a chromosome, the chromosome anomaly symbol serves to define it. However, where an anomaly gives two loci on a single chromosome they can be distinguished by the letters p and d for proximal and distal.
The mitochondria carry essential genes, among them many transfer RNA (tRNA) genes. Genes residing on the mitochondria have a prefix mt- (lowercase mt followed by a hyphen). For transfer RNAs, the symbols consist of three parts, mt-, T (for tRNA), and a single lowercase letter for the amino acid. The chromosomal designation for mitochondrial genes is Chr MT.
mt-Tc tRNA, cysteine, mitochondrial
(a tRNA gene residing on the mitochondria)
mt-Atp6 ATP synthase 6, mitochondrial
(a non-tRNA gene residing on the mitochondria)
Different alleles of a gene or locus can be distinguished by a number of methods, including DNA fragment length, protein electrophoretic mobility, or variant physiological or morphological phenotype.
All mutant alleles, whether of spontaneous or induced origin, targeted mutations, gene traps, or transgenics should be submitted to MGD (mouse) or RGD/RatMap (rat) for an allele or gene accession identifier.
Where a gene is known only by mutant phenotype, the gene is given the name and symbol of the first identified mutant. Symbols of mutations conferring a recessive phenotype begin with a lowercase letter; symbols for dominant or semidominant phenotype genes begin with an uppercase letter.
In mouse, recessive spotting, rs; abnormal feet and tail, Aft; acondroplasia, cn. In rat, polydactyly-luxate, lx.
Further (allelic) mutations at the same locus, if they have the same phenotype, are given the same name with a Laboratory code preceded by a serial number (if more than one additional allele from the same lab). In the symbol the Laboratory code is added as a superscript.
If a new allelic mutation of a gene known only by a mutant phenotype is caused by a transgenic insertion, the symbol of this mutation should use the symbol of the transgene as superscript (see Section 3.4.2 and Section 4).
If the additional allele has a different phenotype, it may be given a different name, but when symbolized the new mutant symbol is superscripted to the original mutant symbol. Also, if a new mutation is described and named but not shown to be an allele of an existing gene until later, the original name of the new mutation can be kept. Even if the phenotype is apparently identical, the original symbol is used, with the new mutation symbol as superscript.
When a spontaneous or induced mutant phenotype is subsequently found to be a mutation in a structural gene, or the gene in which the mutation has occurred is cloned, the mutation becomes an allele of that gene and the symbol for the mutant allele is formed by adding the original mutant symbol as a superscript to the new gene symbol. (The mutant symbol should retain its initial upper or lowercase letter).
If the original mutation has multiple alleles, when describing these alleles, their symbols become part of the superscript to the identified structural gene.
Even if the identified gene is novel and unnamed, it is recommended that it is nevertheless given a name and symbol different from the mutant name and symbol. This will more readily allow discrimination between mutant and wild type and between gene and phenotype.
The wild type allele of a gene is indicated by + as superscript to the mutant symbol.
A revertant to wild type of a mutant phenotype locus should be indicated by the symbol + with the mutant symbol as superscript.
Additional revertants are given a Laboratory Code and preceded by a serial number if more than one revertant is found in a lab. Serial numbers are independent for mouse and rat revertants and no homology is implied. If the revertant is in a gene that has been cloned, then the mutant symbol is retained as superscript to the gene symbol, and + is appended.
Example: electrophoretic or other biochemicalvariant alleles of known structural genes are usually given lowercase letters to indicate different alleles and in the symbol the letter becomes a superscript to the gene symbol.
Variants of DNA segments are indicated by a superscript to the symbol. The symbol is usually an abbreviation for the inbred strain in which the variant is being described. However, a particular allele may be found in several inbred strains, and, furthermore, it may be difficult to establish whether an allele in one strain is identical to one in another. The use of allele symbols for DNA segments is mainly limited to describing inheritance and haplotypes in crosses. As long as the symbols are defined in the description, users are free to use whatever allele symbol best fits their needs. In tables of genotypes, the gene symbol can be omitted and the allele abbreviation used alone.
Polymorphisms defined by SNPs may occur within or outside of a protein coding sequence.
If the SNP occurs within a gene, the SNP allele can be designated based on its dbSNP_id, followed by a hyphen and the specific nucleotide.
Park2rs6200232-G The Park2 rs6200232 SNP allele with the G variant Park2rs6200232-A The Park2 rs6200232 SNP allele with the A variant
If the SNP occurs outside of an identified gene, the SNP locus can be designated using the dbSNP_id as the locus symbol and the nucleotide allelic variants are then superscripted as alleles. If a gene is later discovered to include this SNP locus, the same guidelines are applicable as those used when mutant locus symbols become alleles of known genes.
rs6200616T A SNP locus with the T variant rs6200616C A SNP locus with the C variant
Note: If a gene Xyz is later discovered to include this SNP locus, rs620061, then the alleles listed above become Xyzrs620061-T and Xyzrs620061-C.
Variation in genes that do not give rise to a visible phenotype may be detected by assaying physiological or pathological parameters. Examples of this type of variation include levels of metabolite, immune response to antigen challenge, viral resistance, or response to drugs. Genetic variation may also produce phenotypic variation in morphology, behavior, or other observable traits that interact in a complex manner with other genes and/or with the environment.
These genes can only be identified by virtue of allelic variation. In most cases, there will not be a clear wild type; hence all alleles should be named. In most cases, the alleles should be named according to their strain of origin and symbolized by adding the strain abbreviation as superscript, although for resistance and sensitivity, variants r and s may be used. Bear in mind that resistance alleles deriving from different strains may not be the same and should be given different names and symbols.
Once the gene underlying a quantitative trait has been cloned or identified, the phenotypic name should be replaced by the name of the identified gene. The allele names and symbols should be the same as those used for the phenotype.
Slc11a1r solute carrier family 11, host resistance allele Slc11a1s solute carrier family 11, host susceptibility allele
(the QTL originally known as BCG/Lsh resistance has been identified as Slc11a1)
Scc2BALB/cHeA colon tumor susceptibility 2, BALB/cHeA allele Scc2STS/A colon tumor susceptibility 2, STS/A allele
(for QTL Scc2, the STS/A allele has increased tumor susceptibility vs. BALB/cHeA)
Mutations that are induced, targeted, or selected in structural genes are named as alleles of the structural gene.
Variants of structural genes that are clearly mutations, whether or not they confer a phenotype, are given the superscript m#LabCode, where # is a serial number and is followed by the Laboratory code where the mutation was found or characterized. Serial numbers are independently assigned in mouse and rat and the same assigned serial number does not imply orthology. If the mutation is known to have occurred on a particular allele, that can be specified by preceding the superscript with the allele symbol and a hyphen.
If the mutation is shown to be a deletion of all or part of the structural gene, the superscript dl can be used in place of m. Note that this should be used only for deletions that encompass a single gene; larger deletions should use the chromosomal deletion nomenclature.
Mutations produced by random insertion of a transgene (not by gene targeting) are named as a mutant allele of the gene (which should be given a name and symbol if it is a novel gene), with the superscript the symbol for the transgene (see Section 3.1.1 for examples, and Section 4 for naming transgenes).
Mutations that are the result of gene targeting by homologous recombination in ES cells are given the symbol of the targeted gene, with a superscript consisting of three parts: the symbol tm to denote a targeted mutation, a serial number from the laboratory of origin and the Laboratory code where the mutation was produced (see Section 2.1).
So-called "knock in" mutations in which all or part of coding region of one gene is replaced by another should be given a tm symbol and the particular details of the knock-in associated with the name in publications or databases. Where there has been a replacement of the complete coding region, the replacing gene symbol can be used parenthetically as part of the allele symbol of the replaced gene along with a Laboratory code and serial number.
Whena targeting vector is used to generate multiple germline transmissible alleles, such as in the Cre-Lox system, the original knock-in of loxP would follow the regular tm designation rules. If a second heritable allele was then generated after mating with a cre transgenic mouse, it would retain the parental designation followed by a decimal point and serial number.
Other more complex forms of gene replacement, such as partial "knock-in", hit-and-run, double replacements, and loxP mediated integrations are not conveniently abbreviated and should be given a conventional tm#Labcode superscript. Details of the targeted locus should be given in associated publications and database entries.
Note that although subtle alterations made in a gene appear to lend themselves to a simple naming convention whereby the base or amino acid changes are specified, in fact these do not provide unique gene names, as such alterations, which could be made in independent labs, while bearing the same changes, may differ elsewhere in the gene.
Gene trap mutations are symbolized in a similar way. If the trapped gene is known, the symbol will appear identical to a targeted mutation of the same gene (which, in fact, is appropriate as they will be indistinguishable at the molecular level). If the trapped gene is novel, it should be given a name and a symbol, which could include the letters Gt for "gene trap", the vector in parentheses, a serial number, and Laboratory code.
Any DNA that has been stably introduced into the germline of mice or rats is a transgene. Transgenes can be broken down into two categories:
Nomenclature for targeted genes is dealt with in Section 3.5. Random insertion of a transgene in or near an endogenous gene may produce a new allele of this gene. This new allele should be named as described in Section 3.4.2. The transgene itself is a new genetic entity for which a name may be required. This section describes the guidelines for naming the inserted transgene.
It is recognized that it is not necessary, or even desirable, to name all transgenes. For example, if a number of transgenic lines are described in a publication but not all are subsequently maintained or archived, then only those that are maintained require standardized names. The following Guidelines were developed by an interspecies committee sponsored by ILAR in 1992 and modified by the Nomenclature Committee in 1999 and 2000. Transgenic symbols should be submitted to MGD or RGD/RatMap through the usual nomenclature submission form for new loci. The transgene symbol is made up of four parts:
Tg(Zfp38)D1Htz is a transgene containing the mouse Zfp38 gene, in line D1 reported by Nathaniel Heintz. Tg(CD8)1Jwg is a transgene containing the human CD8 gene, the first transgenic line using this construct described by the lab of Jon W. Gordon. Tg(HLA-B*2705, B2M)33-3Trg is a double transgene in rat containing the human HLA-B*2705 and B2M genes, that were co-injected, giving rise to line 33-3 by Joel D. Taurog.
Different transgenic constructs containing the same gene should not be differentiated in the symbol; they will use the same gene symbol in parentheses and will be distinguished by the serial number/Laboratory code. Information about the nature of the transgenic entity should be given in associated publications and database entries.
In many cases, a large number of transgenic lines are made from the same gene construct and only differ by tissue specificity of expression. The most common of these are transgenes that use reporter constructs or recombinases (e.g., GFP, lacZ, cre), where the promoter should be specified as the first part of the gene insertion designation, separated by a hyphen from the reporter or recombinase designation. The SV40 large T antigen is another example. The use of promoter designations is helpful in such cases.
Tg(Wnt1-LacZ)206Amc designates the LacZ transgene with a Wnt1 promoter, from mouse line 206 in the laboratory of Andrew McMahon. Tg(Zp3-cre)3Mrt designates the cre transgene with a Zp3 promoter, the third transgenic mouse line from the laboratory of Gail Martin.
In the case of a fusion gene insert, where roughly equal parts of two genes compose the construct, a forward slash separates the two genes in parentheses.
Tg(TCF3/HLF)1Mlc is a transgene in which the human transcription factor 3 gene and the hepatic leukemia factor gene were inserted as a fusion chimeric cDNA, the first transgenic mouse line produced by Michael L. Cleary's laboratory (Mlc)
This scheme is to name the transgene entity only. The mouse or rat strain on which the transgene is maintained should be named separately as in the Rules for Nomenclature of Mouse and Rat Strains. In describing a transgenic mouse or rat strain, the strain name should precede the transgene designation.
C57BL/6J-Tg(CD8)1Jwg mouse strain C57BL/6J carrying the Tg(CD8)1Jwg transgene F344/CrlBR-Tg(HLA-B*2705, B2M)33-3Trg rat strain F344/CrlBR carrying the Tg(HLA-B*2705,B2M)33-3Trg double transgene
For BAC transgenics, the insert designation is the BAC clone and follows the same naming convention as the Clone Registry at NCBI.
Tg(RP22-412K21)15Som a BAC transgene where the inserted BAC is from the RP22 BAC library, plate 412, row K, column 21. It is the 15th in the mouse made in the laboratory of Stefan Somlo (Som).
The following definitions should aid the user in understanding what is being named, and in understanding the principles underlying these guidelines.
A gene is a functional unit, usually encoding a protein or RNA, whose inheritance can be followed experimentally. Inheritance is usually assayed in genetic crosses, but identification of the gene in cytogenetic or physical maps are other means of mapping the locus of a gene. The existence of a gene can also be inferred in the absence of any genetic or physical map information, such as from a cDNA sequence.
A sequence that closely resembles a known functional gene, at another locus within a genome, that is non-functional as a consequence of (usually several) mutations that prevent either its transcription or translation (or both). In general, pseudogenes result from either reverse transcription of a transcript of their "normal" paralog (in which case the pseudogene typically lacks introns and includes a poly(A) tail; often called processed pseudogenes) or from recombination (in which case the pseudogene is typically a tandem duplication of its "normal" paralog).
A locus is a point in the genome, identified by a marker, which can be mapped by some means. It does not necessarily correspond to a gene; it could, for example, be an anonymous non-coding DNA segment or a cytogenetic feature. A single gene may have several loci within it (each defined by different markers) and these markers may be separated in genetic or physical mapping experiments. In such cases, it is useful to define these different loci, but normally the gene name should be used to designate the gene itself, as this usually will convey the most information.
A marker is the means by which a gene or a locus is identified. The marker is dependent on an assay, which could, for example, be identification of a mutant phenotype or presence of an enzyme activity, protein band, or DNA fragment. The assay must show genetic variation of the marker to map the locus on a genetic map but not to place it on a physical map.
The two copies of an autosomal gene or locus on the maternal and paternal chromosomes are alleles. If the two alleles are identical, the animal is homozygous at that locus. When genetically inherited variants of a gene or locus are detectable by any means, the different alleles enable genetic mapping. A single chromosome can only carry a single allele and, except in cases of duplication, deletion or trisomy, an animal carries two autosomal alleles. In particular, a transgene inserted randomly in the genome is not an allele of the endogenous locus; the condition is termed hemizygous if the transgene is present only in one of the two parental chromsome sets. By contrast, a gene modified by targeting at the endogenous locus is an allele and should be named as such.
Allelic variants are differences between alleles, detectable by any assay. Differences in anonymous DNA sequences are usually detected as restriction fragment length variants (RFLVs), simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP), or single-stranded conformation polymorphism (SSCP). Other types of variants include differences in protein molecular weight or charge, differences in enzyme activity, or differences at specific nucleotide positions (SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms or MNPs, multiple nucleotide polymorphisms). Most allelic variants, in particular DNA variants, do not confer any external phenotype on the animal. These variants are often termed "polymorphisms" although strictly speaking that term applies only to variants with a frequency of more than 1% in the population.
Alternative splicing of a gene results in different, normally occurring forms of mRNA defined by which exons (or parts of exons) are used. Thus one or more alternative protein products can be produced by a single allele of a gene. Among different alleles, alternative splice forms may or may not differ, depending on whether the sequence difference between the alleles affects the normal splicing mechanism and results in differences in the exon (or partial exon) usage. For example, allele A may produce mRNAs of splice form 1, 2, and 3; while allele B may produce mRNAs of splice form 1, 2, and 4; and Allele C may produce mRNAs of splice form 1, 2, and 3. In this case, each of the alleles A, B, and C by definition must differ in their DNA sequence. However, the difference between allele B versus alleles A and C must include a sequence difference that affects the splicing pattern of the gene.
A mutation is a particular class of variant allele that usually confers a phenotypically identifiable difference to a reference "wild type" phenotype. However, in some cases, such as when homologous recombination is used to target a gene, a readily identified phenotype may not result even though the gene may be rendered non-functional. In such cases, the targeted genes are nevertheless referred to as mutant alleles.
Dominant and recessive refer to the nature of inheritance of phenotypes, not to genes, alleles, or mutations. A recessive phenotype is one that is only detected when both alleles have a particular variant or mutation. A dominant phenotype is detectable when only one variant allele is present. If both alleles can be simultaneously detected by an assay, then they are codominant. For example, an assay that detects variation of DNA or protein will almost invariably detect codominant inheritance, as both alleles are detected. If a mutation produces a phenotype in the heterozygote that is intermediate between the homozygous normal and mutant, the phenotype is referred to as semidominant. A single mutation may confer both a dominant and a recessive phenotype. For example, the mouse patch (Ph) mutation has a heterozygous (dominant) pigmentation phenotype but also a homozygous (recessive) lethal phenotype. As the terms are applied to phenotypes not to genes or alleles, then in the case where a gene has multiple mutant alleles, each can confer a phenotype that is dominant to some, but recessive to other, phenotypes due to other alleles.
Penetrance is a quantitative measure of how often the phenotype occurs in a population; and expressivity is a measure of how strongly a phenotype is expressed in an individual. Particularly in segregating crosses, or where there is a threshold effect on phenotypic manifestation, these measures provide additional ways to describe how particular allelic combinations result in a phenotype.
Genotype is the description of the genetic composition of the animals, usually in terms of particular alleles at particular loci. It may refer to single genes or loci or to many. Genotype can only be determined by assaying phenotype, including test mating to reveal carriers of recessive mutations. Strictly speaking, even direct determination of DNA variants is assaying phenotype not genotype as it is dependent on a particular assay, although it is so close to genotype that it serves as a surrogate.
Phenotype is the result of interaction between genotype and the environment and can be determined by any assay.
Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) are polymorphic loci that contain alleles, which differentially affect the expression of continuously distributed phenotypic traits. Usually these are markers described by statistical association to quantitative variation in the particular phenotypic traits that are controlled by the cumulative action of alleles at multiple loci.
A haplotype is the association of genetically linked alleles, as found in a gamete. They may be a combination of any type of markers, and may extend over large, genetically separable distances, or be within a short distance such as within a gene and not normally separated.
Genes are homologous if they recognizably have evolved from a common ancestor. Note that genes are either homologous or not; there are no degrees of homology! For example, all globin genes, and myoglobin, are homologs, even though some are more closely related to each other than others. When a measure of relatedness between sequences is required, percent identity or similarity should be used.
Genes in different species are orthologs if they have evolved from a single common ancestral gene. For example, the beta globin genes of mouse, rat and human are orthologs. Note that several genes in the mouse or rat may have a single ortholog in another species and vice versa.
Paralogous genes are genes within the same species that have arisen from a common ancestor by duplication and subsequent divergence. For example, the mouse alpha globin and beta globin genes are paralogs.
Committee on Rat Nomenclature, Cochairmen Gill T.J. III, Nomura T. 1992. Definition,
nomenclature, and conservation of rat strains. ILAR News 34:S1-S56.
Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. 1963. A revision of the standardized genetic nomenclature for mice. J. Hered. 54:159-162.
Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. 1973. Guidelines for nomenclature of genetically determined biochemical variants in the house mouse, Mus musculus. Biochem. Genet. 9:369-374.
Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice, Chair: Lyon, M.F.: Rules and guidelines for gene nomenclature, pp. 1-7. In: Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse, Green, M.C. (ed.), First Edition, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 1981.
Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice, Chair: Lyon, M.F.: Rules and guidelines for gene nomenclature, pp. 1-11. In: Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse, Lyon, M.F., A.G. Searle (eds.), Second Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989.
Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice, Chairperson: Davisson, M.T. Rules and guidelines for gene nomenclature, pp. 1-16. In: Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse, Lyon, M.F., Rastan, S., Brown, S.D.M. (eds.), Third Edition, Volume 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996.
Dunn, L.C., H. Gruneberg, G.D. Snell. 1940. Report of the committee on mouse genetics nomenclature. J. Hered. 31:505-506.
International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice, Chairperson: Davisson, M.T.: Rules and guidelines for genetic nomenclature in mice. Mouse Genome 92 (1994)vii-xxxii.
Levan G., H.J. Hedrich, E.F. Remmers, T. Serikawa, M.C. Yoshida. 1995. Standardized rat genetic nomenclature. Mamm. Genome 6:447-448.